Skip to Main Content

Why It’s a Bad Idea to Ask for a Bridge Loan

November 26, 2018

Once a week or so a company will reach out to us looking for “bridge financing” that will carry them to their next funding event. In a way, all financings are bridge financings to some future event. However, the specific request for a short-term bridge loan carries with it unique challenges. I honestly believe many of these companies think bridge financings are a standard part of the funding landscape but, in reality, they are not. (Except when buying a new house.)

SaaS Bridge LoanInvariably, the request for a bridge loan is “as soon as possible.” This generally means that, at the outset, this business is not in control of its funding plan. Nobody capitalizes their business planning for a “bridge” round, so the general assumption is that the company must have significantly underperformed expectations to have arrived in this spot. Also, the time pressure to do a deal quickly puts the lender at a tremendous knowledge disadvantage that is hard to overcome in a short amount of time.

From the lender's perspective, if the loan is “successful” and is paid off by a new round of capital, it will generate modest interest income due to the short duration. The lender might get a high internal rate of return (IRR), but not much in real dollars. If it’s unsuccessful, meaning the event being bridged to evaporates, then something went wrong, and the credit risk has increased substantially. Lenders can overcome these economic realities with large fees and warrants, but that makes the costs extremely high for a short duration loan.

In the vast majority of cases, because of the issues above, “bridge financing” is eventually funded by existing investors. Existing investors are not at an information disadvantage and can move quickly. Also, their economics are much different. They might provide the funding at a low cost in order to preserve the value of their existing investment. And finally, if the existing investors are unwilling to fund the business, it’s another bad signal to any new potential lender.

The takeaways here for founders, managers, and early investors are:

  1. Aggressively work to avoid ever needing a “bridge loan.”
  2. If bridge financing is needed, do not put a lot of effort or confidence in the ability to fund it externally.
  3. If it must be funded externally, prepare to pay a lot, AND please don’t call it a “bridge loan.”
Todd Gardner

Todd Gardner

Founder and Managing Director, SaaS Capital™

SaaS Capital™ pioneered alternative lending to SaaS. Since 2007 we have spoken to thousands of companies, reviewed hundreds of financials, and funded 60+ companies. We can make quick decisions. The typical time from first “hello” to funding is just 5 weeks. Learn more about our philosophy.

Our Approach

Who Is SaaS Capital™?

SaaS Capital™ is the leading provider of long-term Credit Facilities to SaaS companies.

Read More

Subscribe

Get SaaS Capital™ research delivered to your inbox.