Ok, well, “magical” might be a little strong, but there are circumstances where this structure does have specific benefits that are very valuable. In the short post below, we describe how to quantify those benefits to your stakeholders.
Last month I had the pleasure of presenting at the KCSaaS event in Kansas City, MO. KCSaaS is a grassroots industry group spearheaded by longtime SaaS sales executive Mike Poledna. He started the group about a year ago after not finding many SaaS networking and knowledge share opportunities in Kansas City.
In a recent article in Forbes, Max Williams, the CEO of Pusher Ltd, is interviewed about the pros and cons of raising venture capital from an entrepreneur’s perspective. For most of our portfolio companies, raising a VC round is a viable option, and in the full article here, the author and Max do a pretty good job discussing the merits.
Insurance may seem like a pretty boring topic compared with, say What is my SaaS Valuation? but as you may remember from school, it’s a negatively correlated asset – when everything else goes against you, it pays out. So, it’s an important part of life and business, and your needs can change over time as you grow, pivot product and target market, or raise capital, so it’s good to keep in mind and revisit now and again.
Last month my partner Rob and I attended two events focused on customer success (CS) and wanted to post our takeaways. The first event was a half-day summit we held for our own SaaS Capital portfolio companies. The other event was the Pulse Conference.
The Rule of 40 postulates that the growth-rate-plus-profitability-margin of a healthy growth stage SaaS company should be at least 40%. It captures both valuation drivers of a SaaS business: growth and profit, and trades them off dollar for dollar. While this is a compelling and fascinating ‘rule,’ it is by no means the cut-off line between healthy and unhealthy.
Over the years, we have analyzed thousands of SaaS companies and we firmly believe the best metric for benchmarking churn is gross revenue retention which should be benchmarked against companies with similar annual contract values or revenue values per customer.